Search Results for "revenue mutation"

985 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 985 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court hears writ petitions challenging FIR in alleged corruption and land encroachment matter. Petitioners (an ex-MLA and a municipal commissioner) seek quashing of FIR No.4/2017 under PC Act and IPC, arguing political rivalry.

The case pertains to two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 CrPC, seeking quashing of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Mutation of Revenue Records Without Notice. Petitioner Seeks to Quash Entry of Sixth Respondent’s Name in Town Survey Register, Alleging Violation of Natural Justice and Title Dispute Based on Will.

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the entry of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Courts Below Concurrently Held That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Land.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of title and possession over agricultural land. The trial court dismissed the suit, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Petitioner Failed to Prove Tenant Status. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 32-O Allowed as Tenant Could Not Establish Cultivation After Tillers' Day.

The petitioner, Shri Ananda Sakharam Padalkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Manikrao Salunke, was a Naib Tahsildar in Omerga, Osmanabad district. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad, for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Finds Substantial Question of Law on Adverse Possession and Limitation. Court holds that the first appellate court failed to properly consider the plea of adverse possession and limitation, and remands the matter for fresh consideration.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a partition suit. The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for partition and separate possessi...