Search Results for "parent company"

484 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 484 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Decree in License Dispute — Constituted Attorney's Lack of Personal Knowledge Does Not Invalidate Suit When Plaintiff's Ownership is Undisputed and Defendant Fails to Prove Tenancy.

The dispute pertains to Room No.2 (2-A) admeasuring 290 sq.ft on CTS No. 185 situated at 1st Floor, Kumud Villa, 321, Vithalbhai Patel Road, Paper Mil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age and Consensual Relationship. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and evidence showed consent.

The appellant, Omkar Dattatraya Dangat, was convicted by the Special Court under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Gratuity Order — Transfer with Lien Does Not Break Continuous Service Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Employer Liable to Pay Gratuity Based on Higher Pay Scale of Parent Organization.

The petitioner, The Maharashtra State Co-Operative Adivashi Vikas Mahamandal Maryadit, challenged the judgment and order dated 25/11/2019 passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Daughter's Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Chain of Circumstances and Motive.

The appellant, Harischandra Damu Baldhye, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, for the murder of his daughter Nikita under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Striking Out of Defence in Suit for Specific Performance. Defence of Defendant No.2 Restored as Trial Court's Discretion to Strike Out Defence Under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC Requires Willful Disobedience of Injunction Order.

The Petitioner, Sanjay Thakkar, was Defendant No.2 in Special Civil Suit No.144 of 2016 filed by Respondent No.1, Bhojja Shantu Shetty, for enforcemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Construction in Property Dispute Among Family Members. Alleged Breach of Development Agreement and Illegal Construction on Common Property Leads to Status Quo Order.

The dispute arises out of a family arrangement among the Motwane family members regarding a larger property at Khar, Mumbai. On 31st March, 1990, the ...