Search Results for "expert witness"

1406 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1406 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal by Union of India in Railway Property Theft Case, Upholding Acquittal. Confessional Statement Recorded by Police Officer Held Inadmissible Under Section 25 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The Union of India, through the Railway Protection Force, Akola, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 17-08-2000 passed by the Judicia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistencies in Evidence. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 506 Part-I IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nagesh s/o Samayya Made, was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli in Special (POCSO) Case No.21/2016 for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. The court held that the chain of circumstances, including last seen together and recovery of blood-stained clothes, was sufficient to convict under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Salim Kudrat Telli @ Iqbal, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Kabita Dasgupta, wife of the complainant Maniklal Har...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Vishwas @ Guddu Rajesh Dahiwale, Kamlesh @ Kamya Kalidas Patil, and Suraj Raju Manwatkar, were convicted by the trial court for the mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.678 OF 2014

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Partially Allows State's Appeal and Dismisses Claimants' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. Compensation for Acquired Land Reduced from ₹207 to ₹150 per sq. Metre Due to Lack of Comparable Evidence Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition matter. The State, through the Executive Engineer, appealed against the Reference ...