Search Results for "cadre and recruitment rules"

643 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 643 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Veterinary Officers for Unauthorized Absence and Misconduct. Termination simpliciter under probation rules is valid and not punitive, and the petitioners were given adequate opportunity to explain their absence.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by 17 petitioners who were appointed as Veterinary Officers on probation by the Government of Goa. They we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals Challenging Reservation in Promotion for Hyderabad-Karnataka Region Under Article 371J. The Court Held That Article 371J(1)(b) and (c) Include Reservation in Promotion for Local Candidates in Public Services.

The appellants, Smt. A.S. Vimalakshi and Sri R. Shivakumar, were employees of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly Secretariat. They filed writ petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Seniority List in High Court Staff Service. Court upholds the principle that seniority is determined by the date of continuous officiation in a cadre, not by the date of initial appointment or confirmation.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by employees of the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the seniority list of Assistant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Promotion Rule of Forest Development Corporation Requiring Departmental Exam, Dismisses RFO's Petition. Rule 3(1) Providing Different Deadlines for Existing and Future Officers Held Non-Discriminatory as Multiple Opportunities Given and Seniority Not Sole Basis.

The dispute arose when a Range Forest Officer employed with the Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (F.D.C.M.) challenged his supersess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Appoint Recommended Candidate for Judicial Service — Failure to Disclose Adverse Material Violates Natural Justice. The Court Quashed Communications Denying Appointment and Directed Reconsideration After Providing Opportunity of Hearing.

The petitioner, Suhas Arun Malve, an advocate practicing since 2004, applied for the post of Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, Fir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Government's Refusal to Appoint Selected Judicial Candidate Based on Adverse Police Report Without Opportunity of Hearing. Selection Process for Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class Must Be Fair and Transparent.

The petitioner, Suhas Arun Malve, an advocate since 2004, applied for the post of Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promotion Policy for Air Vice Marshal Based on Seniority-cum-Merit. Air Commodore's Challenge Dismissed as Policy Valid and No Right to Promotion.

The appellant, Air Commodore Naveen Jain, was commissioned in the Indian Air Force in 1981 and promoted to Air Commodore in 2011. He was considered fo...