Search Results for "Test identification parade"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Test identification parade"

433 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 433 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused No.3 in Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy and Recovery. The court held that in the absence of direct evidence and with only recovery of a weapon not identified by witnesses, the petitioner was entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC.

2 Jul 2020

The petitioner, accused No.3, filed a petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking bail in Crime No.81/2018 registered a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

11 Jul 2017

The case involves three appeals against conviction under Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 34 IPC. The prosecution alleged that on 21.04.2013, th...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder and Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 302, 307, 120-B IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Criminal Conspiracy and Stabbing Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

13 Jul 2016

The State of Goa appealed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, South Goa, Margao, which acquitted the respondents (original accused)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Illicit Relationship and Last Seen Together Form Chain of Circumstances Proving Guilt Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC.

1 Feb 2016

The appellant, Vijay Vitthal Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Non-Repayment of Loan. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances complete and consistent with guilt.

6 Oct 2015

The appellant, Bhushan Narayan Tandel, original accused no.1, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar in Sessions Case No.17...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds MCOCA Charges Against Accused in Robbery Case — Prior Approval Under Section 23(1)(a) Valid and Charge Not Required to Be Re-Framed After Sanction. The court held that the prior approval under Section 23(1)(a) of the MCOC Act is a condition precedent for investigation, not for framing charge, and the charge can be framed on the basis of material collected during investigation.

21 Apr 2014

The appellant, Anwar Elahi Fazal Elahi Khan, was an accused in MCOC Special Case No.18 of 2012 arising out of Crime No.151 of 2009 registered at Dahis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Trafficking of Minor Bangladeshi Girl for Prostitution Case. Testimony of Victim Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Circumstances Under Sections 366-A IPC, 4 and 5 of PITA, and Section 8(9) of Goa Children's Act.

22 Jan 2014

The case involves an appeal against conviction of Smt. Anju Shah for offences under Sections 342, 323, 366-A of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 4 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction of Accused for Murder, Abduction, Robbery and Destruction of Evidence Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The court held that the chain of circumstances including last seen together, motive, recovery of stolen ornaments, and conduct of the accused was complete and pointed only to the guilt of the accused under Sections 364, 302, 392 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

1 Jul 2013

The appellant, Mahanand Naik, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, North Goa, Panaji in Sessions Case No. 44/2009 for offences under Sections 364, 302...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving and Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rashness or Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304(A) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove High Speed or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

22 Dec 2006

The applicant, Madhukar Gaurishankar Swami, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Khed, in Criminal Case No.482/1987 for offences unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Inadequate Grounds Renders Preventive Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority must consider the possibility of the detenu being released on bail and the impact of existing bail orders when passing a preventive detention order under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.

23 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Mhaisarali Ramzanali Khan, challenged an order of detention dated 21 April 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under Sec...

41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)