Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act"

554 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 554 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Panchayat Order for Demolition of Toilet Constructed on Common Well. Construction of Toilet and Septic Tank on a Common Well Without Permission Violates Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and Public Health Norms.

The petitioner, Milagrina D'Mello, and the first respondent, John Gonsalves, are neighbours sharing a common well on the boundary of their properties....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CIDCO's Second Appeal in Part, Remands for Demarcation of Encroached Land. Dispute over ownership and encroachment of land survey no. 34/1 at Jaswantpura, Aurangabad, with conflicting claims between plaintiffs and CIDCO.

The case involves two second appeals by the City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) against a common judgment of the appellate court. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapsing of Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Statutory Period. Land reserved for postal staff quarters since 1979 becomes free from reservation after notice under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Balkrishna Jagannath Lad, owned land bearing survey No. 103/12/1D/1A at Pandharpur within the limits of Pandharpur Municipal Council. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking to Restrain CIDCO from Enforcing Contractual Stipulation. Writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked to prevent a party to an agreement from insisting upon a contractual term.

The petitioner, M/s G.D.C. Buildcon Pvt Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Withdrawal of Approval for Engineering College Due to Unauthorized Relocation. AICTE's order upheld as petitioners shifted college without prior approval, violating statutory requirements under AICTE Act and University affiliation norms.

The petitioners, Parshvanath Charitable Trust and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 7 Jan...