Search Results for "Maharashtra Police Act, 1951"

624 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 624 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Public Servant for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Applicant, a Deputy Registrar, was prosecuted for alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC without prior sanction as required by Section 197 CrPC.

The applicant, Yogiraj Vasantrao Surve, was working as District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Akola, and previously as Deputy Registrar, Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner to Operate S.T. Canteen During Night Hours Despite Police Restrictions. Exemption under Maharashtra Shops and Establishment Act and Bombay Police Act, 1951 permits 24-hour operation of canteen at bus stand.

The petitioner, Ram Baburao Haral, operates a canteen at the S.T. bus stand in Beed, Maharashtra, under a valid license granted by the Maharashtra Sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused in Police Assault Case Due to Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 332 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Chhalasingh s/o Kishansing Chavan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Basmathnagar, for an offence under Section 332 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Bombay Police Act for Possession of Stolen Property — Recovery Based on Co-accused's Disclosure Statement Not Admissible Against Petitioner Under Section 27 of Evidence Act.

The petitioner, Satish Shivajirao Deshmukh, a jeweller, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nanded, under Section 411 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Communication of Documents — Violation of Section 8 MPDA Act. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detenu Was Not Supplied Copies of In-Camera Statements and Bail Order, Depriving Him of Right to Make Effective Representation.

The petitioner, Omkar Chandrashekhar Kapare, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords...