Search Results for "Detenue"

530 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 530 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Prejudice to Public Order. The court held that the detaining authority failed to properly consider the material and the alleged activities did not affect public order.

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar @ Chandya s/o Devrao Paikrao, challenged a detention order dated 01.07.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Nanded u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under PASA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Pending Bail Application, Vitiating Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 3(2) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985.

The petitioner, Hitesh Gopal More, was detained under a preventive detention order dated 28th July 2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Dadra & Nag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Remand Order in Murder Case for Non-Communication of Arrest Grounds. Petitioner's arrest and subsequent judicial custody held illegal as grounds of arrest were not communicated in writing as required under Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 50 of CrPC.

The petitioner, Hemanth Datta @ Hemantha @ Baby, was arrested on 17.02.2023 in connection with Crime No. 35/2023 registered at Arasikere Town Police S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Improper Verification of In-Camera Statements. Failure to Record Subjective Satisfaction on Truthfulness of Secret Witnesses Renders Detention Invalid Under Section 3 of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Pravin Ganpat Kakad, challenged an order of detention dated 21.08.2020 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nashik City under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat — Single Crime and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Sustain Detention as 'Dangerous Person'.

The petitioner, Vicky Satyawan Chavan @ Barkya, challenged a preventive detention order dated 08/07/2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Placement of Vital Documents. Failure to Place Retraction Statements and Bail Orders Before Detaining Authority Renders Detention Invalid Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, son of the detenu Ramesh B. Doshi, challenged an order of preventive detention passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.

The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Supply of Hindi Translation of Documents to Detenu Not Conversant with English. Failure to Provide Translated Copies of Material Documents Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, Pradeep Panchal, son of the detenu Brahmpal Panchal, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the detention order dated 7 February 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Detenu in Judicial Custody — Failure to Show Imminent Possibility of Bail Renders Order Invalid. Preventive detention cannot be sustained when detenu is already in custody and no cogent material exists to indicate likely release on bail.

The petitioner, father of the detenu Jaidev @ Rajubhai @ J.D. Ramji Mishra, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under M.P.A.D. Act Due to Inordinate Delay in Considering Representation. Detenu's Right to Speedy Consideration of Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated, Detention Order Quashed.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Mohammed Iqbal @ Shembdya Iqbal @ Iqbal Jogeshwari Mohammed Hussain Mandal, filed a writ petition under Article 226...