Search Results for "receiver sale"

458 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 458 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Stamp Duty Dispute Over Arbitral Interim Order. Court Holds That an Order Under Section 17 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Is Not an 'Award' Under Article 11 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, and Thus No Stamp Duty Is Payable.

The petitioners, Mrs. Shaila Mathias and Mrs. Yasmine Felix, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Trademark in Writ Petition Due to Non-Issuance of Mandatory Notice Under Section 25(3) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Registrar of Trade Marks Directed to Restore and Renew Trademark 'KLITOLIN' for Further Period of 10 Years.

The petitioner, Kleenage Products (India) Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in manufacture and sale of wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Robbery in Auto Rickshaw Snatching Case — Identification by Informant and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 394 IPC.

The revision petitioner, Mansingh Dhonduram Sakpal, was convicted by the trial Magistrate for the offence punishable under Section 394 read with Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Maintainability of Suit Challenging Slum Acquisition Proceedings. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Held Maintainable Despite Bar Under Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against an order dated 12 April 2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Suit No.2862 of 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Recovery Proceedings and Civil Imprisonment Order for Non-Payment of Dues. Recovery Officer's Order for Arrest and Detention of Defaulter Under Section 28A of SEBI Act, 1992 Upheld as Valid Exercise of Powers.

The petitioner, Vinod Hinigorani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of orders dated 18.12....