Search Results for "motor vehicles tax"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "motor vehicles tax"

468 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 468 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Inadequate Assessment of Permanent Disability and Future Prospects. The Court held that 60% disability of the lower limb translates to 30% whole body disability under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and applied 40% future prospects for a 30-year-old driver earning Rs.3,000 per month.

24 Mar 2026

The appellant, Janeshwarsinh Vishwanathsinh Sharma, filed a First Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment a...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Income Proof and Incorrect Multiplier Application. Claimant's Cross-Objection Dismissed as Tribunal's Award Was Not Inadequate Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

20 Jan 2026

The case arises from a motor accident on 16.08.1992 when the original claimant, Kaushikbhai Dhansukhlal Shah, was riding his scooter on Makarpura Road...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Incorrect Multiplier Application. Tribunal erred in applying multiplier of 12 instead of 16 based on deceased's age of 35 years under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

21 Sep 2022

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Rameshkumar Kesarwani, died in a bus accident on 5th May 1988 when the bus collided wi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased's Income Reassessed at Rs.7,500 per Month. Tribunal's assessment of income at Rs.5,000 per month was inadequate; court applied multiplier of 18 and added 40% future prospects under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

8 Aug 2022

The appellants, parents of the deceased Chandrakant, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Osmanabad, seeking compensation...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditors' Appeals in SARFAESI Act Case on Appointment of Advocate as Commissioner. The Court held that a District Magistrate or Chief Metropolitan Magistrate can appoint an advocate to take possession of secured assets under Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as an advocate is considered an officer of the court subordinate to the Magistrate.

25 Feb 2022

The dispute centered on the interpretation of Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company's Appeal Dismissed. Multiplier applied as per age of deceased, not claimant, under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

12 Jul 2018

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of Prakash Potdar, who died in a vehicular accident. The decea...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Proper Proof of Income and Correct Multiplier. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.3,84,000 to Rs.16,70,000 for Death of Accountant Aged 28 Years Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

2 Aug 2017

This appeal arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the widow, minor son, and father of the deceased Navneet Vyas, who died in a road acc...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased Was a Gratuitous Passenger, Not a Fare-Paying Passenger, Hence Insurance Company Liable to Pay Compensation. The court upheld the tribunal's award of Rs.4,15,571/- with interest at 6% per annum for the death of a gratuitous passenger in a jeep accident.

25 Jul 2017

The appellant, New India Assurance Company Limited, challenged the judgment and order dated 28.2.2006 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ak...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation of Rs.33,15,500/- to Parents of Deceased Army Soldier. Negligence of Autorickshaw Driver Established; No Contributory Negligence by Deceased.

6 Jan 2016

The case arises from a fatal motor accident that occurred on Belgaum-Khanapur road near Desur cross. The deceased, Sham Mahadev Yallurkar, aged 23, wa...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses KSRTC Appeal and Allows Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Multiplier Corrected from 11 to 13 Based on Age of Injured Claimant. The court held that the multiplier should be based on the age of the injured claimant, not the dependents, and recalculated compensation accordingly.

24 Sep 2013

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by Hasanbasha (the claimant) before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.IV, Bijapur, seek...

40 41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)