Search Results for "detention order quashed"

Trending :

Search Results for "detention order quashed"

1190 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1190 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 quashed as mere registration of FIRs does not constitute a threat to public order.

2 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Suraj @Indo Rajubhai Sakarabhai Raval, was preventively detained by an order dated 23.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Ah...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention without evidence of public order disturbance.

3 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Tushabh @ Roman Sujitbhai Narjibhai Indrekar (Chhara), was preventively detained by an order dated 20.12.2025 passed by the Commission...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Compelling Necessity. Preventive detention set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the petitioner's acquittal in the predicate offence and did not provide sufficient material to justify the subjective satisfaction of imminent threat.

7 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Kishor Laxman Kawale, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders,...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Order Due to Undated Special Report. Detenu's Likely Release on Bail Based on Undated Material Constitutes Non-Application of Mind Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

30 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Gomathi, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the preventive detention order date...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Detention Order in Drug Offender Case Due to Unexplained Delay — Live Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention. Preventive Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Set Aside as Delay of 40 Days Between Arrest and Order Remained Unexplained.

24 Jan 2025

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Thirumoorthy, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras Hi...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Quashing Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay. Unexplained delay of 51 days between arrest and detention order under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 snaps live link, rendering detention invalid.

23 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Thiru Masthan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detention order dated 02....

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Public Order Impact — Bootlegger's Activities Not Shown to Be Prejudicial to Public Order. The court held that the detaining authority failed to produce cogent material to show that the detenu's activities were prejudicial to the maintenance of public order, as distinct from law and order, under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.

18 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Dattatray Baswant Jagtap, challenged his preventive detention order dated 11th April 2019 passed under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Recovery Proceedings and Civil Imprisonment Order for Non-Payment of Dues. Recovery Officer's Order for Arrest and Detention of Defaulter Under Section 28A of SEBI Act, 1992 Upheld as Valid Exercise of Powers.

10 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Vinod Hinigorani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of orders dated 18.12....

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Petitioner in Judicial Custody at Time of Order. Court held that detaining authority failed to demonstrate compelling reasons or imminent possibility of bail, rendering detention order illegal.

24 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Fazal Sikandar Patel, challenged a detention order dated 26.08.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad under Section 3(1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Orders Renders Detention Invalid. The detaining authority's omission to consider bail orders in the criminal cases relied upon as grounds of detention vitiates the subjective satisfaction under Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act.

10 Oct 2006

The petitioner, father of the detenu Sanjay Ramrup Gupta, challenged the detention order dated 21/10/2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan...

40 41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)