Search Results for "agreement purchaser"

1802 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1802 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act for Release of Goods Withheld by Warehousing Service Provider. Court directs release of goods upon payment of admitted storage charges, holding that a bailee cannot retain goods for disputed amounts beyond the contract.

The Petitioner, Direct Logistics and Export Co. Ltd., a Hong Kong-based trading and logistics company, entered into a Service Agreement dated 21.06.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell, Upholds Refund of Earnest Money. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform its part of the contract under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, M/s. Dreams Construction Private Limited, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a land admeasuring 1 Hector and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Impound Agreement of Sale in Specific Performance Suit. Notarised Agreement of Sale Not an Instrument Chargeable with Stamp Duty Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

The petitioners (defendants in the suit) challenged a common order dated 22/8/2019 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge at Pune in Special Suit No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Holds Obligation to Deliver Possession Inherent in Agreement of Sale. Absence of Express Stipulation in Agreement for Possession Does Not Bar Decree for Delivery Under Section 55(1)(f) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The dispute arose from an agreement to sell dated 12.03.1997 for agricultural land. The respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010034632013_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction Against Developer in MOFA Dispute Over Common Areas and Parking Rights. Developer restrained from constructing on open space and selling car parks as they are common facilities under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The dispute arises from a development project known as Phoenix Towers in Parel, Mumbai. The appellants, Phoenix Construction Company and another, are ...