Search Results for "Project Affected Person"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Project Affected Person"

996 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 996 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.

10 May 2013

The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Scope of Section 34 Arbitration Act in National Highways Acquisition Disputes - The court considered whether modification of arbitral awards is permissible under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, particularly for compensation awards under the National Highways Act, 1956.

20 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court addressed a significant legal question regarding the scope of judicial intervention under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concilia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantors — Personal Guarantee Not a 'Right or Interest in Property' Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Guarantors Cannot Challenge Possession Notice Before Debt Recovery Tribunal Under SARFAESI; Remedy Lies Under RDDB Act, 1993.

10 Mar 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Mahindra Chandrasen and Sharad Chandrasen (petitioners) against Union Bank of India and other respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Petitions Challenging Mumbai Port Trust's Summary Eviction Notices Under Bye-law No.9. Petitioners Sought Declaration That Bye-law No.9 Ultra Vires Public Premises Act and Violated Natural Justice.

27 Mar 2018

In a batch of writ petitions, occupants of structures at Reay Road, Mazgaon, Mumbai, challenged eviction notices issued by the Mumbai Port Trust on 06...

High Court

Petitioner Challenges NCLT Order Admitted Under Section 7 IBC on Ground of Non-Pronouncement and Violation of NCLT Rules. High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Petition Alleging Order Non-Est for Lack of Pronouncement in Open Court.

29 Nov 2019

Not mentioned - judgment text incomplete...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Shiksha Karmis in Bias and Natural Justice Conflict. Breach of Audi Alteram Partem Cured by Revisional Hearing Where No Actual Bias Proved Under Section 40(c) of Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993.

27 Jan 2025

The case involves four civil appeals arising from a split verdict of the Supreme Court regarding the validity of appointments of Shiksha Karmi (Grade ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order Directing Buyout of Majority Stake in Wind Energy Company. The majority shareholder challenged the finding of oppression and the forced sale of shares to minority shareholders under sections 397, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956.

20 Aug 2015

The proceedings arose from disputes between the shareholders of Enercon (India) Limited, now known as Wind World (India) Limited, a company engaged in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Investigation into Financial Crimes by Corporate Entities and Public Officials. Court holds that a writ petition for registration of FIR is not maintainable when petitioner is not an aggrieved person and has alternative remedy under Section 156(3) CrPC.

24 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Alpesh Navinchandra Gosalia, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court seeking...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Tribunal's Reading Down of Forest Watcher Recruitment Rules to Include Candidates from Adjoining Villages. The court held that the 5 km radius restriction was arbitrary and discriminatory under Article 14 of the Constitution, and the rule must be read down to include villages adjoining the forest area.

22 Jan 2014

The case involves writ petitions filed by the State of Karnataka and forest department officials against an order of the Karnataka Administrative Trib...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging KERC Order Dated 14.05.2018. The Petitioners, Renewable Energy Companies, Seek to Quash the Regulatory Order.

13 Mar 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various renewable energy companies, including Renew Power Limited an...

40 41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)