Search Results for "suspicious recovery"

527 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 527 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Related Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 449, 506(ii) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Parthiban @ Logaraj and Gowtham @ Gowthaman (Accused Nos. 1 and 2) challenging their conviction and se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Evidence of Interested Witness Was Contradictory and Improbable.

The appellant, Kalam Gulab Patel, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karad, for the murder of his cousin Sikandar Ismail Patel under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Electrocution Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge and Common Intention. Conviction under Section 304 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove That Appellants Knew the Electric Wire Was Lethal.

The appellants, Vilas Hari Kulmethe and Laxman Kanhu Pendam, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Onerous Bail Conditions in Commercial Dispute Case — Directs Defreezing of Bank Account. Court held that imposing condition of depositing Rs.59 crore for bail in a case arising from a commercial transaction is unreasonable and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Vyomesh Shah, Kiran Contractor, and Suhass Dumbre, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, P. Somaraju, was an Assistant Commissioner of Labour in Hyderabad. The complainant, S. Venkat Reddy (PW-1), a licensed labour contracto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Appellant Fails to Prove Self-Acquired Property. Joint Family Property Presumed Where Common Funds Used and Possession Shared.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents (plaintiffs) against the appellant (defendant) seeking partition and separate possession o...