Search Results for "dangerous activities"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "dangerous activities"

759 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Municipal Notice for Trade Licence on Cinema Exhibition Under Karnataka Municipalities Act. Cinema Exhibition Held Exclusively Regulated by Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964, Not Subject to Municipal Trade Licence Under Section 256 of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964.

5 Feb 2026

The dispute originated from a notice issued by the Chief Officer of the City Municipal Council, Chintamani, directing the petitioners, and its proprie...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Placement of Full Bail Order Before Detaining Authority. Failure to Furnish Complete Bail Order Violates Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

7 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Vikram @ Bala Shahaji Sonavane, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 18/7/2024 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Than...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detention order set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the petitioner's bail status and relied on stale material.

10 Nov 2023

The petitioner, Asif Shaikh, challenged an order dated 22nd June 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, detaining him under Section 3(2) o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Accused in Gambling Cases — Acts Disruptive of Law and Order, Not Public Order. Offences under Section 65(D) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 and Section 12 of Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 do not affect public order as they are directed against individuals and do not disturb even tempo of community life.

6 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Jumma @ Munna Burhan Hiriwale, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider that the petitioner was already in custody and no credible material showed likelihood of release on bail.

10 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Mukesh Prakash Bhalerao, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 23rd January 2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalgao...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Placement of Bail Documents. Failure to place bail applications and orders before the Detaining Authority vitiates subjective satisfaction under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drugs Offenders, Dangerous Persons and Video Pirates Act, 1981.

25 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Ramesh Dandekar, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur challenging the detention order dated 01.12.202...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Recital of Grounds. Detenu's Preventive Detention Based on Three Criminal Cases Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Less Restrictive Measures and Did Not Properly Assess 'Disturbed Area' Condition.

3 Sep 2020

The petitioner, Ajay Nandkishor Pasi, challenged his preventive detention order dated September 9, 2019, passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Unexplained Delay in Disposal of Representation. Failure to Consider Detenu's Representation Promptly Violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution, Rendering Detention Invalid.

20 Dec 2016

The petitioner, Yahya @ Ayya Akbar Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 30 July 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Detenu's Representation and Inadequate Grounds Renders Preventive Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority must consider the detenu's representation before confirming detention and that vague grounds violate Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

28 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Shri Sujit Suresh Menpal, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai, on 7/10/2005 under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Petitioner's Application for Documents Renders Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority's failure to consider the petitioner's application dated 2.10.2004 seeking copies of documents vitiated the detention order under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders & Dangerous Persons Act, 1981.

17 Aug 2005

The petitioner, Ramesh Ramnath Shetty, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai, on 17th September 2004 under ...

39 40 41 42 43

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)