Search Results for "conviction restored"

444 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 444 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes FIR in Rash Driving Case Based on Compromise Between Parties. Offences Under Sections 279, 338, 504 IPC Held to Be Non-Serious and Compoundable with Court's Permission, Allowing Quashing in the Interest of Justice.

The petitioner, Padmanabh Rawal, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Rape Case Due to Compromise and Marriage Between Parties — No Prima Facie Case Found as Couple Living Together.

The petitioner, Ravindra Laxman Ghogardare, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad seeking quashing of FIR No. I266...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Heirs' Challenge to Gold Seizure and Penalty Under Gold (Control) Act, 1968 — Upholds Tribunal's Finding of Possession of Primary Gold Without Permit. Burden of Proof on Possessor Not Discharged; Penalty of Rs. 5,000 Upheld as Within Statutory Limits.

The petitioners, heirs of late Ramratan Shrivallabh Chandak, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28th February 1986 passed by the Customs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Civil Court's Dismissal of Suit on Ground of Arbitration Clause Under Stock Exchange Bye-laws. Transaction Not Through Stock Exchange Member, Hence Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Recovery Suit.

The petitioners, M/s. Prashant Commercial, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 23 lakhs against the respondent, Rajratan R. Mohta, claiming that the amou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Applications in Cheque Dishonour Cases Due to Non-Application of Mind by Trial Court. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is rebuttable and trial court must consider defence evidence before convicting.

The case involves three criminal revision applications filed by Rajat Jaiprakash Rastogi, Mrs. Gursimran M. Deol, and Lt. Col. B.T. Jade against M/s. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Complainant's Challenge Against Discharge of Accused in Import Export Act Case. Complaints under Section 5 of Import and Export (Control) Act, 1947 were not maintainable as the Act stood repealed and complaints lacked valid sanction.

The Deputy Chief Controller of Import & Export, Mumbai, filed separate complaints against various accused before the Metropolitan Magistrate, 19th Cou...