Search Results for "commercial arbitration application"

1179 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1179 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge to Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 7.39 Crore with Interest. Limitation plea rejected as claim was within time; quantification not perverse.

The judgment concerns a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Securities Claim on Grounds of Forum Shopping. Petitioners Contend That Regulatory Proceedings Against Clearing Member and Arbitration Against Depository Are Distinct, Allowing Simultaneous Pursuit Under Indemnity Principles.

This matter arises from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Filing Arbitration Application Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Dispute Centers on Whether Limitation Runs from Original Award or Belated Correction Order When Section 33 Application Filed Beyond 30 Days.

The writ petitions challenged the order of the Commercial Court condoning the delay in filing arbitration suits under Section 34 of the Arbitration an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Referral to Arbitration in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement of Sale Contains Valid Arbitration Clause. Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 mandates referral when arbitration agreement exists and subject matter is arbitrable.

The Petitioner, Suman Baburao Thapa, was the defendant in Special Civil Suit No.566 of 2011 filed by Respondent Nos.1 and 2 (Jigar K. Mehta and Anand ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages, rejecting grounds of patent illegality and public policy.

The petitioners, Pradyuman Kumar Sharma and Kuber Planters Limited, filed four arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Mandamus to Enforce Lease Renewal Clause Against Central Railway. Clause 20.1 of Lease Agreement Does Not Confer Automatic Right of Renewal; Railway's Discretion to Invite Fresh Tenders Upheld.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Parcel Carriers (India) Pvt Ltd and Scorpion Express Pvt Ltd against the Union of India and Central ...