Search Results for "Illegal gratification"

458 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 458 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction. Sanction Granted by Sub-Divisional Officer Instead of Collector Held Incompetent, Despite Satisfactory Evidence of Demand and Acceptance.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti-Corruption Bureau, Satara, appealed against the acquittal of Ramdas Bhagwan Vairat, a Talathi (village reve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Section 353 IPC Case for Lack of Evidence of Assault or Criminal Force. Conviction under Section 353 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that appellant assaulted or used criminal force to deter public servants from discharging their duty.

The appellant, Mahendra Kumar Sonker, a Patwari, was convicted under Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for allegedly assaulting or usin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Railway Protection Force Constable for Gross Neglect of Duty and Abuse of Authority. High Court's Reinstatement Order Set Aside for Exceeding Writ Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence.

The case arose from disciplinary proceedings against Rajendra Kumar Dubey, a Constable in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), who was charged with gro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Judicial Officer for Granting Bail and Acquitting Accused, Holding That Wrong Orders Alone Do Not Constitute Misconduct. Disciplinary Action Requires Proof of Extraneous Considerations or Corrupt Motive, Not Mere Errors of Judgment.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the legal representatives of the deceased judicial officer, Krishna Prasad Verma, against the State of B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal for Back Wages in Dismissal Following Acquittal Case. Employee Acquitted of Criminal Charges Entitled to Full Wages for Suspension Period and Back Wages from Acquittal to Reinstatement.

The appellant, Raj Narain, was a Sorting Assistant in Railway Mail Service placed under suspension on 23.10.1979 following allegations of forged payme...