Search Results for "Bombay Public Trusts Act"

529 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 529 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Tenancy Provisions in Maharashtra Tenancy Act. Maximum Rent and Purchase Price Fixation Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21.

The petitioners, a trust and its trustees, challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 11 and 15 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Municipal Tax Dispute — Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Tax Exemption Claim. Order VII Rule 10 CPC Allows Return of Plaint for Presentation Before Proper Forum When Court Lacks Jurisdiction.

The appellant, Akola Gujrati Samaj, a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act and a society under the Societies Registration Act, 18...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Trust Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Civil Court Cannot Entertain Suit Relating to Public Trust Administration When Exclusive Remedy Lies Before Charity Commissioner Under Sections 80 and 50 of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit in the City Civil Court, Mumbai, seeking various reliefs against the trustees of Respondent No.3 Tru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trust Property Dispute — Possession of Suit Plot Not Acquired by Government. Land Acquisition Proceedings Did Not Include the Suit Plot, Hence Government Cannot Claim Title or Possession Without Proper Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 25.9.1995 of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Yavatmal, dismissing Special Civil Suit No.86/1994 f...