Search Results for "additional district judge"

10025 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10025 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Two Regular First Appeals Under Section 96 CPC Against Common Judgment in Suits for Declaration, Injunction, Partition, and Dissolution of Partnership — Property Dispute Involving Sites in Mysore and Bangalore

The Regular First Appeals RFA No.37/2003 and RFA No.84/2003 were filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the common j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Culpable Homicide Case, Dismisses State Appeal for Murder. The court held that the act of causing death without intention to murder falls under Section 304 Part II IPC, and acquittal under Section 302 IPC was proper.

The judgment arises from two cross-appeals: Criminal Appeal No.237/2009 filed by the original accused (Arun Gabhaji Pakade, Ankush Arun Pakade, Panchf...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeal Against Grant of Freedom Fighter's Pension to Widow — Liberal Construction of Beneficial Pension Legislation Required Despite Delay in Application

The respondent, Smt. Ningawwa, an 84-year-old widow, filed a writ petition before the learned Single Judge seeking quashing of the order dated 22.09.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Decides Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Murder under Section 302 IPC and Against Non-Imposition of Fine. The Court Examined the Evidentiary Value of Oral Dying Declaration and the Requirement of Imposition of Fine under Section 302 IPC.

The case concerns the murder of A.C. Yathisha on 03.04.2013. The prosecution alleged that the accused, Rajegowda @ Guruswamy, assaulted the deceased w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved and Suit Barred by Limitation. The court upheld concurrent findings that the plaintiff failed to prove the agreement and the suit was time-barred under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, Manohar Pamandas Jani, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decre...