High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Filed by Government Department Against Its Employees. The Petitions Relate to Service Conditions at Government Observation Homes.
14 Sep 2017...
Search Results for "Three Years"
19847 result(s) found
Found 19847 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Age Eligibility for Family Court Judge — Minimum Age of 35 Years Must Be Completed as on the Date of Advertisement. The court held that the condition of minimum age must be satisfied as on the date of advertisement, not on the last date of application, under Section 6 of the Family Courts Act, 1984.
3 Dec 2010The petitioner, Mrs. Mayuri Deshmukh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the administrative decision of the High ...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined Based on Prior Sale Deed and Potential Value Method. Court upheld Reference Court's award of enhanced compensation for acquired land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, relying on a comparable sale instance and potential value of the land for development.
30 Nov -0001The State of Maharashtra, through the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Panvel, filed appeals against the judgment and award of the Reference Court (C...
- 231
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in POCSO Case Due to Flawed Age Determination by Juvenile Justice Board, Directs Fresh Determination. Board Failed to Conduct Mandatory Preliminary Assessment of Age Before Transferring Case to Children's Court, Violating Section 15 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
11 Mar 2024The dispute arose from a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and the Protection of Children f...
- 24
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Petition of Directly Recruited District Judges Seeking Elevation as High Court Judges by Clubbing Advocate Experience with Judicial Service. Article 217(2) of the Constitution Prescribes Separate Eligibility Criteria for Judicial Officers and Advocates, Which Cannot Be Combined.
4 Sep 2020The petitioners, eight directly recruited District Judges in Tamil Nadu, sought elevation as High Court judges. They argued that their experience as a...
- 304
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Gramin Dak Sevaks Pension Case — GDS Service Cannot Be Counted for Qualifying Service Under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. The Court held that service as Gramin Dak Sevak is not 'qualifying service' under the 1972 Rules and cannot be added to regular service for pension eligibility.
8 Nov 2019The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from decisions of various Central Administrative Tribunals and High Courts on the common quest...
- 472
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Considers Land Acquisition Lapse Challenge Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Petitioners, landowners, argued that acquisition for BTM Layout had lapsed due to non-payment of compensation, and the appeals arose from a Single Judge's common order dated 14.12.2017.
19 Apr 2021The writ appeals arise from a common order dated 14.12.2017 passed by the Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka. The appellants, landowners and ...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Partition Suit. Court holds that issues of limitation and cause of action are mixed questions of law and fact requiring trial under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
24 Feb 2025The judgment arises from two Civil Revision Applications (CRA No. 12/2024 and CRA No. 13/2024) filed by defendants in a partition suit (RCS No. 78/202...
- 915
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Union and State in Consumer Protection Rules Challenge, Reversing High Court's Striking Down of Qualification and Procedure Provisions. Rules 3(2)(b), 4(2)(c), and 6(9) of Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office, resignation and removal of President and Members of State Commission and District Commission) Rules, 2020 Found Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, as They Provide Sufficient Guidelines for Appointments to Consumer Commissions.
3 Mar 2023The Supreme Court addressed appeals by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Union of India, and State of Maharashtra against a common judgment and order ...
- 365
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Promotion and Directing Promotion of Senior Teacher as Head Master. Seniority List Not Challenged Earlier Cannot Be Reopened in Appeal Under Section 9 of MEPS Act.
26 Mar 2024The case involves a challenge by petitioners, Krishna Mahadu Gasti (an Assistant Teacher promoted to Head Master) and Gram Vikas Shikshan Mandal (the ...
- 63
