Search Results for "Detenue"

530 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 530 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Recital of Grounds. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated as Relevant Material Not Considered.

The petitioner, Rupesh Laxman Gaikwad, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Stale Grounds. Single FIR and Bail Not Sufficient to Treat Detenu as Dangerous Person Affecting Public Order.

The petitioner, Vishal Aananda Mahabal, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootlegger...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition in Customs Act Detention Case — Detention Held Not Illegal. Petitioner's arrest under Section 104 of Customs Act, 1962 and subsequent judicial custody were lawful; no violation of Articles 14, 21, 22 of Constitution found.

The petitioner, Ankit Ghanshyam Mutha, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus and direction for his release from custody of the Directo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application. Failure to Disclose Compelling Reasons for Detention Despite Awareness of Custody Renders Order Invalid Under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Pravin @ Purshottam Shrinivas Mahajan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 29 April 2014 passed by the Commissioner of P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application — Detaining Authority Failed to Disclose Compelling Reasons for Detention.

The petitioner, Pravin @ Purshottam Shrinivas Mahajan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 29 April 2014 passed by the Commissioner of P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Compelling Reasons — Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Procedural Safeguards Not Satisfied

The petitioner, Baban Prakash Ranware, challenged a detention order dated 14.2.2012 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pune under Section 3(1) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pre-Execution Challenge to COFEPOSA Detention Order for Lack of Grounds Under Alka Subhash Gadia Criteria. Petitioner's Argument That Detention Was for Wrong Purpose Rejected as Activities Constituted Smuggling, Not Mere Abetment.

The petitioner, Suresh Kumar U. Jain @ Sanjay Srinath Rana, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Retracted Statement Not Considered. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Retraction of Confession.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Iqbal Yusuf Suleman, challenged the detention order dated 20.4.2004 passed by the detaining authority under Section...