Search Results for "Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017"

426 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 426 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition for Refund of IGST on Ocean Freight -- Sets Aside Appellate Order Directing Limitation Verification -- Reliance on Precedents for Mistake of Law Refunds

16 Jan 2026

The petitioners imported fertilizers on CIF basis, paying IGST on ocean freight under reverse charge mechanism as per RCM Notification No.10/2017. Aft...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Admiralty Suit for Arrest of Vessel — Sets Aside Ex-Parte Order of Arrest for Non-Disclosure of Material Facts. Court holds that a plaintiff seeking arrest of a vessel must make full and frank disclosure of all material facts, including the existence of an arbitration agreement and the vessel's status as a River-Sea Vessel under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958.

19 Aug 2022

The case involves an appeal by the defendants, MT Pamboor 2 (the vessel) and Shiny Shipping & Logistics Private Limited, against an ex-parte order of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Rejection of GST Refund Claim for Non-Compliance with Appellate Order. Revenue Authority Directed to Recompute Refund in Accordance with Section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

1 Feb 2022

The petitioner, M/s. Globus Petroadditions Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an order d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Tender Dispute, Upholding Limited Judicial Review Under Article 226 of Constitution of India. The Court Reiterated That Judicial Interference in Tender Awards is Restricted to Cases of Arbitrariness or Irrationality, and Courts Must Defer to the Tendering Authority's Interpretation of Contract Terms.

17 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed a civil appeal concerning the scope of judicial review in tender matters under Article 226 of the Constitution. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Over Soybean Oil Labels — Deceptive Similarity Established Despite Minor Variations. The court held that the defendant's label for soybean oil was deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered label mark and artistic work, and granted an interim injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Copyright Act, 1957.

9 Mar 2021

The plaintiff, Sanjay Soya Private Limited, filed a suit for trademark and copyright infringement against the defendant, Narayani Trading Company, all...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal on Maintainability of Writ Petition Against Bar Association. Court Examines Whether Bar Association is Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 in Dispute Over Co-Option of President.

30 Nov 2020

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a writ petition by a Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka on the ground of maintainability. The writ pet...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Rafale Procurement Case, Corrects Factual Error in Judgment. The Court held that the review petitions did not disclose any error apparent on the face of the record and that the scope of judicial review under Article 32 in procurement matters is limited to examining the decision-making process, pricing, and offsets.

14 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court of India delivered a judgment on a review petition and miscellaneous applications arising from its earlier judgment dated 14.12.2018...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Limitation Bar — Winding Up Petition Filed Beyond Three Years from Default Date Cannot Be Revived Under IBC. The Court held that a time-barred winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 cannot be treated as a valid Section 7 application under the IBC, and the filing of a suit for specific performance does not extend limitation for a winding up petition.

25 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from the admission of a winding up petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The pet...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Education and Service Matters — Multiple Petitioners Seek Relief Related to Education and Service Disputes. No specific legal finding extractable as judgment text is limited to the cause title and party list without any substantive content.

21 Dec 2018

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Considers Appeals Against Quashing of SC/ST Liquor License Reservation Notification. Single Judge Quashed Notification as Discriminatory, State Appeals.

20 Jan 2017

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, by this common order, addressed a batch of writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Ac...

38 39 40 41 42

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)