Search Results for "CPC amendment 1976"

457 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 457 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Cancellation of CL-2 Licences for Alleged Distance Violation — Held That Rule 8(2) of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) Rules, 1968 Does Not Apply to Shops Existing Before 2002 Amendment and That Show Cause Notice Must Precede Cancellation.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Shankar Wines and M/s. Blue Peacock Ventures, both holders of CL-2 licences under the Karnataka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell, Upholds Refund of Earnest Money. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform its part of the contract under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, M/s. Dreams Construction Private Limited, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a land admeasuring 1 Hector and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Mortgage Redemption Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for redemption of mortgage filed after 26 years held barred by limitation and not maintainable as mortgage was not proved.

The appellants, Sanjay Punamchand Pipada and Zamkubai Punamchand Pipada, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree of the Regular Civil Su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 28-A Application for Enhanced Compensation Based on High Court's Appellate Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Land owners covered by same notification can seek parity under Section 28-A even if reference court refused enhancement.

The petitioners, legal heirs of original land owners Shankarrao Pandoji Shendge and Bhagwan Pandoji Shendge, owned agricultural land in Mouza Ansing, ...