Search Results for "workmen's compensation"

940 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 940 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Industrial Dispute Reference Due to Procedural Irregularity in Conciliation Initiation Under Industrial Disputes Act

The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal filed by Appellants challenging the reference of industrial dispute to Industrial Court, Aurangabad -- The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Workmen's Appeal in Industrial Dispute Against Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam — Reinstatement with 30% Back Wages Upheld for Directly Engaged Gardeners. Termination During Conciliation Proceedings Violated Section 6E of U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves appeals by workmen (Gardeners) and the employer (Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam) against a High Court judgment modifying Labour Court awards....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal, Reduces Compensation in Workmen's Compensation Case. Commissioner's assessment of 100% loss of earning capacity set aside as contrary to medical evidence showing 26% disability under Section 4(1)(c) of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, against the order dated 19th June ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Labour Union Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award. Reinstatement Without Back Wages Upheld for One Workman, Denied for Others Due to Lack of Evidence of Continuous Service Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Petitioner, Pune Labour Union, filed a writ petition challenging the award of the Industrial Tribunal, Pune, dated 21 August 1999, which partly al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Not Liable for Injury Not Arising Out of Employment. Seaman's Back Injury While Shifting Food Boxes Held Not Covered Under Section 3 of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 as Injury Did Not Arise Out of and in Course of Employment.

The case involves an appeal by M/s Denklay Marine Services Ltd. and M/s Orinoco Marine Consultancy India Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment and order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Award of Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement for Workman Involved in Factory Altercation. The court held that the domestic enquiry was fair and the compensation of 30 months' wages was appropriate under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petition was filed by the Rayon Workers' Union and the workman, Dinesh Pratap Singh, challenging the award of the 4th Labour Court at Thane in Ref...