Search Results for "weapon not deadly"

309 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 309 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Arms Act Violation in Land Dispute Shooting. Appellant-accused fired two rounds from a revolver at the deceased, causing death, and the court confirmed life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC and Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959.

The case arises from a land dispute that led to a fatal shooting. On 07.06.2012, the complainant and his son Nagjiji were at their agricultural field ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder in Premeditated Group Attack Case. Inconsistencies in Witness Testimony Regarding Weapon Used Held Not Fatal to Prosecution Case as Core Version Remains Consistent.

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by the appellant, who was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Assault Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Civil Nature of Dispute. FIR under Sections 323, 324, 341, 427, 504, 506 IPC quashed as allegations were vague and the dispute was civil.

The petitioners, C. Ganesh Narayan and Vidya Nataraj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder and Grievous Hurt Case Arising from Land Dispute. Evidence of Injured Witness and Eye-Witnesses Found Credible Under Sections 302/149 and 325 IPC.

The case arises from two incidents on 15 October 1998 in village Kodebod, district Dhamtari (now Chhattisgarh). A land dispute existed between the fam...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Dnyanoba Baburao Pandhare and Lilawatibai Pandhare, were convicted by the trial court under Sections 302, 323, 324 read with 34 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Four Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Conviction under Sections 302, 326, 324 read with Section 34 IPC confirmed as prosecution proved chain of circumstances leading to the murder of the deceased.

The case involves four appellants who were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of one person and causing injuries to othe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Life Imprisonment Confirmed Based on Credible Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Common Intention Established Under Section 34 IPC for Fatal Assault During Altercation.

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals filed by three accused persons convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Rajes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Three Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC confirmed as prosecution established chain of circumstances leading to the murder of Laik Khan.

The appellants, Arunkumar @ Kallu Rajendraprasad Pande, Ashok @ Guddu Rajendraprasad Pande, and Santosh @ Lallu Rajendraprasad Pande, were convicted b...