Search Results for "used car fraud"

102 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 102 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging E-Auction Sale Due to Alternate Remedy Under SARFAESI Act. Petitioner, as second highest bidder, alleged collusion and system malfunction but was directed to approach Debts Recovery Tribunal.

The petitioner, Radhika Rajesh Agarwal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Appellants in Forgery Case for Clerical Error in Vakalatnama. High Court's Direction to Lodge Complaint Set Aside for Lack of Satisfaction Under Section 340 CrPC.

The case arises from a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dated 14.09.2016, which dismissed the anticipato...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Assault Case Due to Compromise Between Parties — Inherent Powers Under Section 482 CrPC Used to Quash Non-Compoundable Offences Where Settlement is Genuine and Voluntary.

The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Cases — Upholds Compensation for Death of Pillion Rider and Injuries to Others. Held that insurer is liable to pay compensation as the vehicle was insured and the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving.

The case involves three first appeals filed by Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. against the common judgment and award of the Motor Accident Cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010069912016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...