Search Results for "twelve months detention"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "twelve months detention"

78 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Habeas Corpus Petition — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives Under Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. Detenu's History of Criminal Cases Does Not Justify Preventive Detention When Bail Was Granted in Most Cases and No Material Shows Inadequacy of Regular Law.

7 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Mohammad Shafiulla, father of the detenu Roshan Jameer @ Jameer @ Jammu, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Const...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Accused in Gambling Cases — Acts Constitute Law and Order, Not Public Order. Offences under Section 65(D) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 for gambling do not affect public order, and delay in considering representation vitiates detention under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

6 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Jumma @ Munna Burhan Hiriwale, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Boo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Accused in Gambling Cases — Acts Disruptive of Law and Order, Not Public Order. Offences under Section 65(D) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 and Section 12 of Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 do not affect public order as they are directed against individuals and do not disturb even tempo of community life.

6 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Jumma @ Munna Burhan Hiriwale, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proper Verification of In-Camera Statements. Detention order under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act set aside as detaining authority failed to verify in-camera statements and did not consider that the alleged incident was a public agitation.

21 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Avinash @ Balu Atmaram More, challenged his detention order dated 07-06-2022 passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Compelling Necessity. Preventive detention order under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act set aside as detaining authority failed to consider that detenu was in judicial custody and did not independently verify in-camera statements.

3 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Sandeep Govind Pawar, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Stale Grounds. Single FIR and Bail Not Sufficient to Treat Detenu as Dangerous Person Affecting Public Order.

4 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Vishal Aananda Mahabal, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootlegger...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Under MPDA Act for Lack of Evidence of Public Order Disturbance. Sand Smuggling and Criminal Acts Do Not Automatically Justify Preventive Detention as They Pertain to Law and Order, Not Public Order.

3 Aug 2020

The petitioner, Baliram s/o Namdeo Bedke, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Mechanical Reproduction of Police Report Without Independent Satisfaction by District Magistrate.

26 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Anant Manikrao Kachale, an agriculturist from Vaitagwadi, Parbhani, challenged his preventive detention order dated 24-08-2017 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Confirmation by State Government. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider the possibility of bail and the State Government mechanically confirmed the detention, rendering the orders unsustainable.

4 Dec 2017

The petitioner, Mohammed Mustafa, challenged the preventive detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad under Section 3(1) of the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Bootlegger — Detenu Acquitted in Multiple Excise Cases. Preventive detention under Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985 set aside as ordinary criminal law sufficient.

19 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Gajji Veeresh, was detained under a preventive detention order dated 01.03.2014 passed by the Deputy Commissioner and District Magistr...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)