Search Results for "transport appellate tribunal"

876 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 876 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC030058022017_1

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by workmen of the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Penalty Under Central Sales Tax Act for Alleged Misuse of Registration Certificate. Court Holds That Mere Issuance of C-Forms Without Actual Inter-State Movement Does Not Attract Penalty Under Section 10(d) of CST Act, 1956.

The petitioner, M/s. Brijda Roadlines Pvt. Ltd., a transport company engaged in the business of transportation and holding a dealership from Bharat Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Penalty Under Central Sales Tax Act for Alleged Misuse of Declared Forms. Court holds that penalty under Section 10(d) read with Section 10A of the CST Act, 1956 cannot be imposed without establishing mens rea or conscious violation of law.

The petitioner, M/s. Brijda Roadlines Pvt. Ltd., a transport company engaged in the business of transporting goods and holding a dealership from Bhara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Maritime Board Dispute Over Cargo Handling Charges. Court sets aside majority award directing payment at Rs.3 per metric tonne, remits matter for fresh consideration on applicability of 1995 or 1996 policy.

The Maharashtra Maritime Board (Claimant) filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Assignment of Stage Carriage Timings Due to External Dictation and Invalid Tribunal Directions. The Tribunal’s General Directions Under Section 90 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Were Held to Be Without Jurisdiction and Non-Compliance with Natural Justice.

The writ petitions arose from the assignment of timings for stage carriage permits in Udupi district. The petitioner, K. Satish Nayak, an existing sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by State in Vehicle Registration Dispute — Civil Court Jurisdiction Barred Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Refusal to Register Vehicle as Transport Vehicle Must Be Challenged Before State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Not Civil Court.

The case involves a dispute over the registration of a vehicle as a transport vehicle. The plaintiff, Yeshwant Narayanrao Thakre, purchased a Mini-Doo...