Search Results for "trade mark rectification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "trade mark rectification"

64 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trademark for Non-Use and Discrepancy in User Date — Ayyappan Brand Registration Expunged. The court held that failure to prove use of the mark as registered and unexplained discrepancy in user date warrant removal under Sections 47 and 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

11 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/s.Sree Lakshmi Balaji Industries, filed a petition under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, seeking removal/rect...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Petitioner in Trade Mark Rectification Case Due to Prior Rights and Dishonest Adoption. Impugned 'C21' Registrations Cancelled as Respondent Incorporated 'CENTURY 21' into Corporate Name and Registered Identical Marks Without Explanation, Violating Sections 11, 47, 57 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a multinational franchising company, the Petitioner, engaged in real estate business under the marks 'CENTURY 21' and 'C21', chal...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Transfer of Rectification Petitions Under Trade Marks Act; Statutory Rectification Jurisdiction Confined to High Court Exercising Appellate Jurisdiction over Appropriate Registry. Interpretation of Sections 47 and 57 of Trade Marks Act, 1999, and Rule 4 of Trade Mark Rules, 2017, Precludes Exercise of Jurisdiction by High Court Over Entries Made by Another Registry.

20 Feb 2025

The petitioner, a company engaged in trade mark disputes, had filed a civil suit before the Madras High Court (Commercial Division) for infringement a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tilaknagar's Injunction Claim in Trademark Passing Off Dispute Over MANSION HOUSE and SAVOY CLUB. Court Holds That 1987 Agreements Ceding Trademarks Were Conditional and Revocable, and Tilaknagar Failed to Establish Exclusive Ownership.

7 Feb 2025

The judgment arises from a commercial IPR suit involving a counterclaim by Tilaknagar Industries Ltd. (Tilaknagar) against Herman Jansen Beverages Ned...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition in Trademark Infringement Case, Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Stay Suit Pending Rectification. Civil Court Has Concurrent Jurisdiction to Decide Infringement and Validity of Trademark Under Section 124 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

13 Sep 2024

The petitioners, M/s. Sri Laxmi Balaji Industries and M/s. Sri Laxmi Vinayaka Rice Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Aglowmed Limited v. Aglow Pharmaceuticals Private Limited. Plaintiff's registered trademark 'AGLOWMED' held infringed by defendant's use of 'AGLOW' for pharmaceutical products, and defendant restrained from using deceptively similar name.

30 Jul 2019

The plaintiff, Aglowmed Limited, filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, Aglow Pharmaceuticals Private Limited, from us...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Defendant for Infringing Registered Trade Mark 'Indian Express' in Devnagari Script. The Court held that use of the mark in Devnagari script constitutes infringement and passing off, rejecting the defence of honest concurrent use.

23 Oct 2015

The Plaintiffs, The Indian Express Limited and Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd., are the owners and proprietors of the well-known 'Indian Expre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks 'MONTINA' and 'MONTINAL'. Phonetic Similarity Between Registered Mark 'MONTINA' and Defendants' Mark 'MONTINAL' for Medicinal Preparations Constitutes Infringement Under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

24 Dec 2013

The Plaintiff, Aristo Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, who were manufacturin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Parksons Cartamundi Pvt. Ltd. v. Suresh Kumar Jasraj Burad. The court found that the marks 'MERELANE' and 'MARICELL' are deceptively similar and granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the mark 'MARICELL'.

21 Mar 2012

The appellant, Parksons Cartamundi Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for infringement of its registered trademark 'MERELANE' and for passing off against the res...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Injunction Against Trademark Threat in 'HOKEY POKEY' Dispute. Prior Registration of Defendant's Mark Under Class 30 Prevents Passing Off Claim Despite Plaintiff's Subsequent Use.

1 Jul 2011

The plaintiff, Drums Food International Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit seeking a declaration that a cease and desist notice issued by the defendants, Euro Ic...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)