Search Results for "taxing entry interpretation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "taxing entry interpretation"

125 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 125 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Classification of Nescafe Premix as Coffee Under Entry 3 of Schedule C Part II of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Product 'Coffee and Instant Drinks Nescafe Premix' Held Not Covered by Entry 18(2) (Beverages) Based on Common Parlance Test and Predominant Ingredient.

27 Nov 2025

The case involves a reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mahara...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in Customs Duty Priority Dispute Over Wound-Up Company's Hypothecated Goods. Held that customs authorities do not have priority over secured creditors under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 for sale of warehoused goods under Customs Act, 1962.

1 Sep 2023

The appeal by Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) challenged the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court which held that customs authorities...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Manufacturer Challenging Turnover Tax Assessment Under Karnataka Sales Tax Act. Levy of turnover tax on total turnover including interstate sales for classification purposes is constitutionally valid and does not exceed legislative competence.

28 Mar 2019

The appellant, M/s. Achal Industries, a manufacturer and registered dealer of cashew kernels and cashew shell oil, was assessed for turnover tax under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Gypsum Board Tax Classification Case. Holds that Gypsum Board Falls Under 'Gypsum in All Its Forms' Entry in Rajasthan VAT Act, Taxable at 4%.

8 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Additional Commissioner (Legal), Commercial Taxes, Rajasthan and another against the judgment of th...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows State Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Vegit-Aloo Hara Bara Kebab Held Not a Vegetable Product. Classification under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 depends on predominant ingredient and common parlance, not processing method.

20 Mar 2015

The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act challenging the order of a learned Single Judge in Writ Pet...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Vegit-Aloo Hara Bara Kebab Held Not Exigible to Tax Under Entry 82 of Schedule IV of KVAT Act, 2003. The court held that the product, being a mixture of dehydrated potato flakes and vegetables, does not fall under the specific taxing entry and is not exigible to tax.

20 Mar 2015

The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal challenging the order of a learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.40521/2010 dated 10.02.2011. The respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Classification of Stainless Steel Water Filter as Utensil Under Bombay Sales Tax Act. Water Filter Held to Be a Utensil Covered by Schedule Entry C-II-46, Not a General Item.

21 Oct 2005

The case involved two references under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1958, at the instance of the Revenue. The respondent, M/s Neelam App...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Manufacturer for Refund of Octroi Duty on Imported Chemical Intermediate. Sulphonic Acid, a Raw Material for Detergents, Not Covered Under Entry 18 of Schedule H to the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 as It Is Not a Substance Used in Washing.

25 Feb 2005

The petitioner, Hindustan Lever Limited, a manufacturer of soaps and detergents, imported Sulphonic Acid, a toxic chemical intermediate used as raw ma...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)