Search Results for "tainted order"

884 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 884 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Anil Meshram, a BSNL employee, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gadchiroli for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 1,500 from com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Accused Contends Non-Proof of Bribe Demand and Admission of Loan Repayment by Complainant.

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 29.03.2005 in Special Case No.26/2003 passed by the Special Judge at Aurangabad, convicting the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Policemen and Private Citizen in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) and Section 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was interested and testimony uncorroborated.

The case involves two appeals against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants in Criminal Appeal No.248/02 were police...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Madhav Bhalchandra Rajurkar, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, for demanding and accepti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Manik Dajibaji Bhatkar (accused no.1) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Uncorroborated Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mahalingappa, a retired Junior Engineer of KPTCL, was convicted by the Special Judge and Principal Sessions Judge, Bidar, in Special Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jitendra Kumar Jain, was convicted by the Special Judge, Silvassa, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Pr...