Search Results for "shareholding pattern"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "shareholding pattern"

87 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 87 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation Between Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Under Section 394 of Companies Act, 1956 — Restructuring of Casby Group Approved. Court found the scheme fair, reasonable, and not contrary to public interest, with no objections from Regional Director.

19 Mar 2015

The judgment concerns a petition filed by Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. (Transferor) and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (Transferee) seeking sanction of a scheme of ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order for Disclosure and Restraint Pending Suit on Foreign Judgments. The Order Directs Disclosure of Assets and Restraint on Alienation, Drawing Challenge Under Section 13 CPC and Execution Principles.

30 Jul 2026

The appeal arises from an order dated 5 May 2026 passed by the Single Judge in an interim application in a suit filed by the respondents on 24 April 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd v. Williamson Magor & Co Ltd & Anr — Put Option Agreement Dispute. The court found that a valid arbitration agreement existed based on correspondence and conduct, and appointed a former judge as arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Disallowance of Interest on Funds Advanced to Sister Concern Not Justified When Own Funds Exceed Advances. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding that no disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is warranted when the assessee's own funds are sufficient to cover advances to sister concerns.

7 Oct 2015

The case involves appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Mere Change of Opinion Not Sufficient to Reopen Assessment After Four Years. The court held that where the original assessment was completed under Section 143(3) after due inquiry, reopening beyond four years requires failure to disclose material facts, which was not established.

18 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Nihilent Technologies Private Limited, a private limited company engaged in software development, challenged a notice dated 29 March 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Deemed Dividend Case Under Section 2(22)(e) of Income Tax Act. ITAT Correctly Held That Loans to Assessee Were Not Covered as Deemed Dividend Since Lender Companies Had No Accumulated Profits.

8 Feb 2019

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 20th Fe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Freezing of Demat Accounts of Promoter for Non-Compliant Company Under SEBI Circulars — Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Freezing of all securities held by a promoter in a non-compliant company, including unrelated investments, without notice or hearing is arbitrary and illegal under Article 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution.

26 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed two writ petitions filed by Dr. Pradeep Mehta and his son Neil Pradeep Mehta challenging the freezing of their demat acc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

High Court

ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026

17 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Orders Forensic Audit and Status Quo in Real Estate Project Dispute Over Fund Siphoning Allegations. The Court Approved Forensic Audit Findings That the Amrapali Group Controlled the La-Residentia Project and Diverted Buyer Funds, Leading to Interim Relief for Apartment Buyers Under Writ Petition (Civil) No. 940 of 2017.

29 Jun 2022

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil original jurisdiction matter, addressed a dispute concerning the Amrapali La-Residentia real estate project. Th...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)