Search Results for "section 7"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "section 7"

60 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 60 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Show Cause Notice Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act — Petitioners Directed to Submit Representation Before Competent Authority. Writ petitions against show cause notice under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 are not maintainable unless issued by incompetent authority; petitioners must exhaust statutory remedy.

2 Apr 2026

The present writ petitions were filed challenging a show cause notice issued under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. The petiti...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Encroachment Case — Directs Authorities to Treat Final Notice as Show Cause Notice. Procedural Fairness Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 Requires Prior Opportunity of Hearing Before Eviction.

1 Apr 2026

The writ petitioner, K. Kanagaraj, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging a notice i...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Eviction Order for Non-Consideration of Objections Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act. Tahsildar's failure to consider petitioner's reply to Section 7 notice before passing Section 6 eviction order violates principles of natural justice.

23 Jan 2025

The petitioner, S.Palanisamy, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, ...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging NCLT Order Admitting CIRP Against Corporate Debtor — Default and Debt Admitted, No Ground for Interference Under Article 226. The court held that the existence of debt and default is sufficient for admission under Section 7 IBC, and the writ petition is not maintainable due to alternative remedy under Section 61 IBC.

23 Jan 2025

The writ petition was filed by Dharamshi K. Patel and Kamala D. Patel, shareholders and suspended directors of Evershine Wood Packaging Private Limite...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CBI Appeals in PC Act Cases: Consent Under Section 6 DSPE Act Not Required for Investigation of Central Government Employees; Notification Under Section 3 PC Act Not a Condition Precedent for Trial by Special Judge.

11 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court of India heard two appeals filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against a common judgment of the High Court of Andhra ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Maintainability of Gratuity Application Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Dispute Over Quantum of Contractual Gratuity Under Section 4(5) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Falls Within Jurisdiction of Controlling Authority Under Section 7.

8 Aug 2024

The petitioner-employer, Vitesco Technologies India Pvt. Ltd., challenged the order of the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act-cum-I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Death of Named Arbitrators in Arbitration Clause. Clause 21 of Agreement Construed as Valid Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 May 2012

The Applicant, Global Cements Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale with the Respondent, The Associated Cement Companies Ltd., on 16 December 1989....

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favor of PepsiCo Due to Absence of Valid Arbitration Agreement. The Court Held That Without a Signed Contract Containing an Arbitration Clause, the Arbitrator Lacked Jurisdiction to Entertain the Claim.

17 Apr 2012

The case involves a challenge by PepsiCo India Holding Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner) against an arbitral award dated 7 January 2010 passed by a sole arbitrat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sale of Fragment to Adjacent Owner Under Section 7 of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. Sale of Fragment to Owner of Adjacent Survey Number is Valid as 'Contiguous Owner' Includes Owner of Adjacent Land.

27 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Balwantrao Bhagwantrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition challenging the sale of a fragment of land (Survey No. 7/1) by respondent No. 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Family Property Dispute — No Arbitration Agreement Exists Between Parties. Will Clause Cannot Substitute Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Mrs. Padmini Chandran Menon, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking app...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)