Search Results for "section 366 CrPC"

153 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 153 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Delay in FIR Led to Benefit of Doubt for Accused Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and SC/ST Act.

The State of Gujarat filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 10.01....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging MPID Act Application in NSEL Scam Case — Held That MPID Act Applies to NSEL as a Financial Establishment and That Default in Repayment of Deposits Attracts Offences Under the Act.

The judgment arises from multiple criminal appeals and interim applications filed by various parties, including directors, brokers, and financial inst...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Act Despite Victim's Consent and Cohabitation. Consent of a Minor Is Irrelevant for Offences Under the POCSO Act and Section 376 IPC, and the High Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Acquitting Based on Such Consent.

The Supreme Court of India dealt with a suo motu writ petition and a criminal appeal arising from a judgment of the Calcutta High Court. The backgroun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Suspension of Life Sentence in Murder Case — Bail Granted Without Proper Application of Mind. High Court Failed to Consider Seriousness of Offence and Prima Facie Guilt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Omprakash Sahni, brother of the deceased Manish Kumar, filed appeals against a common order of the Patna High Court suspending the life...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Resolves Conflict on Applicability of Section 167(2)(a)(i) vs (ii) CrPC for Default Bail in Offences Punishable with Life Imprisonment. The court held that life imprisonment is a term of not less than ten years, thus the 90-day period under clause (ii) applies.

The case arose from a reference made by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court while hearing a bail application filed by two accused persons,...