Search Results for "section 311 CrPC"

213 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 213 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom in Panchkula Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Circumstantial evidence including call detail records and IMEI numbers sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 364A, 392, 120B IPC.

The appellants were convicted by the trial court for kidnapping a boy, Sachin Garg, for ransom, robbery, and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Recall of Witness in Criminal Trial for Further Examination — Right to Fair Trial Includes Opportunity to Re-examine Witness on New Evidence. The Court held that rejection of recall prayer after CFSL report became available was a denial of fair trial under Section 311 CrPC.

The appellant, Satbir Singh, filed a criminal appeal against the order of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana dated 14.12.2021, which rejected his pray...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal and Remands Murder Case for Fresh Trial Due to Denial of Fair Trial. Conviction Under Sections 498A and 302 IPC Set Aside as Non-Examination of Medical and Forensic Witnesses and Non-Marking of Postmortem Report Vitiates Trial and Violates Article 21.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madhugiri, which convicted the appellant, the husband of the deceas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in NDPS Case: Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC After Conviction Is Impermissible. The power under Section 319 CrPC can be exercised only before the pronouncement of judgment; once the trial concludes and judgment is pronounced, the court becomes functus officio.

The Supreme Court of India heard two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had dismissed crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Recall of Victim for Cross-Examination in POCSO Case — Right to Fair Trial Prevails Over Delay. The court held that the accused's right to fair trial includes effective cross-examination, and the trial court's rejection of the recall application was not justified.

The petitioner, Chandrakant @ Kantu, was accused in Special Case (POCSO) No.11/2018 for offences under Sections 366(A) and 376(2)(i)(n) of IPC and Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Witness in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 311 CrPC for Effective Cross-Examination. Petitioner Accused Granted Opportunity to Recall Complainant's Witness to Ensure Fair Trial and Just Decision.

The petitioner, Kavita Agrawal, was the accused in a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, pending before the Judic...