Search Results for "scheme framing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "scheme framing"

536 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 536 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the arbitrator's findings of fact and declined to re-appreciate evidence, reaffirming the limited scope of judicial review under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Sharekhan Limited, a stock broker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbi...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Single Judge's Order Directing Consideration of Layout Plan Approval Despite Lapsed Scheme. Scheme Notification Under Sections 17(1) and 17(3) of Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 Lapses After 5 Years Without Section 19 Declaration.

2 Dec 2024

The State of Karnataka and the Deputy Commissioner of Vijayapura filed a writ appeal against the order of a learned Single Judge in W.P.No.201785/2023...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for POCSO Victim Under NALSA Scheme — Inadequate Compensation of Rs. 1,00,000 Enhanced to Rs. 10,50,000. The court held that the NALSA Scheme mandates minimum compensation of Rs. 7,00,000 for sexual assault victims, which can be enhanced by 50%.

27 Jun 2023

The appellant, Smt. Lalitha, mother of a minor victim of sexual assault, filed an appeal under Section 372 CrPC challenging the adequacy of compensati...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Safety Regulation and Government Exemption Order Under Electricity Act, 2003. The Court addressed whether Regulation 116 is ultra vires, if transfer schemes protect unqualified employees, and the arbitrariness of a Government Order granting exemptions from safety qualifications.

18 Feb 2022

The dispute originated from a writ petition filed in the High Court of Kerala challenging Regulation 116 of the Central Electricity Authority (Measure...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Order VIII Rule 6A CPC Mandatory for Filing Counterclaim Before Written Statement. Counterclaim Filed After Written Statement Is Not Permissible as Provision Imposes Embargo on Belated Filing.

19 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court of India, in a three-judge bench, addressed a reference regarding the interpretation of Order VIII Rule 6A of the Code of Civil Proc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

15 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service Under Rule 23 of LIC Pension Rules, 1995, and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement.

15 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Complainant to Lead Further Evidence After Accused's Evidence in Private Complaint Proceedings — Section 246 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Re-examination. The court held that the Magistrate has discretion to permit the complainant to lead further evidence after the accused's evidence in a private complaint case, setting aside the order rejecting such application.

13 Jul 2018

The respondent (complainant) filed a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. alleging that the petitioner (accused No.1) married another woman (ac...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Allowing Complainant to Lead Further Evidence After Accused's Evidence in Private Complaint. Section 246 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Re-examination of Complainant After Accused's Evidence.

13 Jul 2018

The case involves a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner (accused No.1) against the respondent (complainant). The respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

10 Jun 2013

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)