Search Results for "retirement gratuity"

593 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 593 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension to Voluntary Retiree with 17 Years Service Under General Insurance Pension Scheme. Supreme Court Precedent in Kirpal Singh Applied to Override 20-Year Qualifying Service Requirement.

The petitioner, Suhas Vinayak Sohoni, was appointed as a Development Officer in the National Insurance Co. Ltd. on 10 February 1985. After completing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Recovery from Gratuity of Retired Class III and IV Employees. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong pay fixation without fault of employee is impermissible after retirement.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by retired Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) employed with Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The petitioners, J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim of Terminated LIC Employee in Fraud Case, But Denies Pay Revision. Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 4(6) Requires Termination Order for Forfeiture; Employee Not Entitled to Post-Termination Pay Benefits.

The petitioner, Shivaji Kerba Paikrao, was employed with the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) initially as an Assistant and later as a Higher...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MHADA to Pay Interest on Delayed Gratuity to Retired Employee. Interest of 4% Awarded Despite Pending Departmental Enquiry as Employee Was Deprived of Funds for Over Four Years.

The dispute arose from the withholding of retirement benefits, particularly gratuity, of an Assistant Estate Manager of the Maharashtra Housing and Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Voluntary Retirement Offer in Service Dispute — Reinstatement and Back Wages Granted. Employee's Withdrawal Within Notice Period Valid Under Service Regulations, Employer's Refusal Unjustified.

The petitioner, Sheikh Imtiyaz Babur, was employed as a Senior Clerk with the Board of Trustees of Mormugao Port Trust (Respondent No. 1). On 21.02.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Pro-rata Pension for Voluntary Retiree Under Bank's Voluntary Retirement Scheme. Employee with 11 years of service and over 40 years of age held eligible for pension under Regulation 14 of Central Bank of India (Employees') Pension Regulations, 1995.

The case involves an appeal by the Central Bank of India against a judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which allowed the writ petition of the respond...