Search Results for "remand order finality"

346 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 346 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes SVLDRS-3 Form Demanding Arrears Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme Due to Non-Application of Mind by Designated Committee. Petitioner's Declaration Under Dispute Category Wrongly Treated as Arrears Category Without Considering Relevant Material.

The petitioner, M/s. Unique Enterprises, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging form SVLDRS-3 issued under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Deposit Water Charges Arrears Under Order XV-A CPC in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Consent Terms and Lease Deed Interpretation Confirm Tenant's Liability for Water Charges Despite Claim of Lessor's Responsibility.

The petitioners, Nikhilesh Keshrichand Jhaveri and others, challenged the judgment and order dated 12 July 2021 passed by the Appellate Bench of Small...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Revision Application Under Indian Forest Act. Minister's order set aside for non-application of mind and failure to consider material evidence regarding agricultural character of land.

The petitioner, Vijayalaxmi Shrinivas Panditrao, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 20th August, 2019 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Commissioner's Order on Building Proposal Validity — Held That Commissioner's Decision Under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Is Final and Not Subject to Judicial Review on Merits.

The petitioner, M/s Mahendra Builders, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Central Excise Appeal in Purification Activity Case — Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Judicial Indiscipline. Purification of excise duty paid goods on job work basis does not amount to manufacture under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Tribunal bound by precedents.

The Bombay High Court disposed of Central Excise Appeal No.179 of 2014 and Civil Writ Petition No.279 of 2015 by a common order. The appellant, Sunbel...