Search Results for "registry direction"

966 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 966 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Police Action and Reference for Contempt in Lalita Kumari Compliance Case. Court holds that petitioner failed to demonstrate any violation of directions in Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P. and that the Chief Judicial Magistrate's order was not perverse.

The petitioner, Vishwas Sudhanshu Bhamburkar, filed a Special Criminal Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Execution of Share Purchase Agreement in Corporate Dispute Over IT Park Acquisition. Court holds that SPA is necessary to effectuate earlier order and does not prejudice rights of respondents.

The Supreme Court disposed of a miscellaneous application in a civil appeal concerning the acquisition of shares in I.T. Infrastructure Park Pvt. Ltd....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of workman without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and reinstatement with full back wages upheld.

The petitioner, M/s. Carona Ltd., challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 30th September 2016, in Reference (IDA) No. 156...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Mortgagee Bank in Admiralty Suit Regarding Priority of Claims Over Vessel Sale Proceeds. Court Has Power to Fix Time Limit for Filing Claims Against Sale Proceeds to Ensure Finality and Expeditious Distribution.

The appellant, Sparebanken Sogn Og Fjordane, a Norwegian bank, filed an admiralty suit against the vessel M.V. Bos Angler and its owners seeking enfor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Caste Certificate Invalidation as Not Maintainable Before Division Bench. Preliminary objection upheld that matters under Act 23 of 2001 must be heard by Single Judge as per Chapter XVII Rule 18(3) of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.

The petitioner, Nilofarnaz w/o Nazkatkhan, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court ...