Search Results for "reasonable time"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "reasonable time"

15015 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15015 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes 13-Year-Old Show Cause Notice for Inordinate Delay in Adjudication — Failure to Adjudicate Within Reasonable Time Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Statutory Scheme Under Finance Act, 1994

22 Aug 2023

The petitioner, UPL Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging 47-Year-Delayed Gut Map Amendment Under Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. Power Under Section 31A Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time Despite Absence of Limitation; Amendment Creating New Road Held Not a Mere Clerical Correction.

6 Jul 2026

The Bombay High Court heard a writ petition challenging an order dated 14 August 2008 by the Superintendent of Land Records, Sangli, amending a Gut Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Gut Map Amendment After 47-Year Delay; Holds Power Under Section 31A Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time. Correction of Alleged Clerical Mistake in Consolidation Scheme That Altered Road Pattern Amounts to Illegal Variation Under Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947.

6 Jul 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, heard a writ petition filed by four agriculturists of Village Shene, Taluka Walva, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order Resuming Land to Government — Ground of Violation of Non-Alienation Condition Raised After 55 Years. Court Holds That Power Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Cannot Be Exercised After Inordinate and Unexplained Delay, Citing Joint Collector Ranga Reddy District v. D. Narsing Rao (2015) 3 SCC 695.

1 Jul 2017

The writ petition was filed by Basavaradhya challenging the order of the Deputy Commissioner, Kolar District, dated 21.10.2015, which directed the res...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Consolidation Scheme Under Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 — Application Filed After 44 Years Held Barred by Limitation. Power Under Section 32 Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, Ordinarily Not Beyond Three Years; Earlier Objections Do Not Cure Delay.

9 Oct 2017

The dispute pertained to the reopening of a consolidation scheme for agricultural lands in village Kasba Aalte, taluka Hatkanangale, district Kolhapur...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order in Land Grant Cancellation Case Due to Inordinate 46-Year Delay. The Court held that the exercise of revisional power under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 must be within a reasonable time, and the cancellation of revenue entries after more than four decades was unsustainable, particularly when the original grant had never been challenged and revenue entries enjoyed presumptive value under Section 133.

13 Jan 2020

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 24.10.2011 passed by the Depu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Order in Land Ceiling Case Due to Unreasonable Delay. The Court Held that suo motu power under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 must be exercised within a reasonable time, and an 8-year delay vitiated the proceedings.

25 Jul 2006

The dispute revolved around the exercise of suo motu revisional jurisdiction by the Additional Commissioner under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agr...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Order Dismissing Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on Ground of Limitation. Court Holds that Chief Justice/Designate's Power is Administrative and Does Not Extend to Deciding Limitation; Such Issues are for Arbitral Tribunal.

27 Apr 2005

The instant writ petition was filed by the petitioners, a partnership firm and its partner, challenging an order that dismissed their application unde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Quashing Commissioner’s Revisional Order in Land Revenue Matter; Commissioner’s Delayed Revisional Exercise Under Section 211 Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 Deemed Unreasonable

21 Apr 1969

The case arose from an application by Patel Raghav Natha, an occupant of agricultural land in Rajkot, seeking permission under section 65 of the Bomba...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeal Challenging Decree for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement — Appellants Argue Time Was Essence of Contract and Plaintiff Defaulted on Payment. The Court Frames Issues on Time Essence and Plaintiff's Continuous Readiness and Willingness to Perform.

24 Apr 2026

The case arose from a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed against the judgment and decree dated 25.04.20...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)