Search Results for "re-settlement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "re-settlement"

490 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 490 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Statue Beautification Due to Non-Compliance with RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Acquisition Initiated Without Following Mandatory Preliminary Steps Under Sections 4 and 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Violating Article 300A of the Constitution.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Dr. Chandrashekhar Gattani, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of his land bearing Nazul Plot No. 41/1, admeasuring 660...

High Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Under 2013 Act. Compensation Must Be Determined as per Market Value Under Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Without Applying Theory of Dediction from Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as per Section 26 of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

27 Mar 2025

The dispute arose from the acquisition of land for widening and four-laning of National Highway No.12-A in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, under The Right t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Refer Dispute Under Section 64 of Land Acquisition Act. Competent Authority Directed to Refer Dispute Regarding Apportionment of Compensation to Arbitrator Under Section 51 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

7 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Gandharva Dhaneshwar Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 29 January 2024 passed by the Deputy Collector (Rehabili...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition Award Due to Availability of Statutory Remedy Under Section 64 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Writ petitions held not maintainable as alternative remedy by reference to Land Acquisition Authority is efficacious.

13 Sep 2023

The petitioners, Sow. Neha Jitendra Agrawal and Shri Rajendra Madhukar Kulkarni, filed separate writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Acts in Challenge Based on Repugnancy to Central Act of 2013. Presidential Assent Under Article 254(2) Protects State Enactments from Being Void Despite Repugnancy to the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

9 May 2023

The case involves a challenge to the validity of three Tamil Nadu State Acts: the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, 1978...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Land Owner's Consent Essential for Mode of Acquisition Under Section 126(1) MRTP Act — TDR Grant Requires Agreement, Not Unilateral Authority Action. The Court ruled that the option between monetary compensation and TDR under Section 126(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 is not solely with the acquiring authority but requires the consent of the land owner.

25 Jul 2022

This judgment arises from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, which disagreed with the view taken in Asha Sunil Z...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — Solatium and Interest Granted on Enhanced Compensation. The court held that solatium under Section 30 and interest under Section 69 of the 2013 Act are mandatory and must be paid on the entire enhanced compensation awarded by the Reference Court.

16 Dec 2021

The petitioners, landowners from Sukewadi and Akole in Ahmednagar district, filed writ petitions challenging the judgment of the Reference Court under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Subsequent Purchaser in Land Acquisition Case — Purchase After Section 4 Notification Confers No Right to Challenge Acquisition or Invoke Section 24 of 2013 Act.

14 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered whether a purchaser of land after issuance of a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can invoke...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Toll Collection on National Highways — Holds Toll Plazas Within Municipal Limits Not Illegal Under NH Act and Rules. Court interprets Rule 9 of National Highways Fee Rules, 2008 as not requiring alternative road for every toll plaza; toll collection upheld as valid fee for highway use.

13 Apr 2017

The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of public interest litigations and writ petitions challenging the collection of toll on national highways pass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pune Municipal Corporation's Revision Against Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement. Reference Court's enhancement of compensation upheld as based on evidence and within its jurisdiction under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

30 Nov -0001

The Pune Municipal Corporation filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)