Search Results for "rash and negligent driving"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "rash and negligent driving"

1368 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1368 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Tribunal's Failure to Consider Evidence — Claimants Entitled to Compensation Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Court held that under Section 163A, the claimant need not prove negligence, and the Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim on the ground that the offending vehicle was not identified.

12 Jan 2026

The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, being the wife, major children, and parents of the deceased Shantilal Kalabhai Garasia, a Poli...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Partially Allows Appeal by Pune Municipal Corporation in Motor Accident Claim, Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. The Court held that the deceased was 50% contributory negligent for the accident, modifying the Tribunal's 25% deduction.

21 Jul 2023

The Pune Municipal Corporation appealed against the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal, Pune, in Claim Petition No.581 of 2014, ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Appellant in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rashness or Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 304-A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the accused drove in a rash or negligent manner causing death.

7 Dec 2020

The appellant, Sagar Lolienkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, South Goa, Margao, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeals in Motor Accident Claims — Negligence of Maruti Van Driver Upheld. Compensation Awarded to Legal Heirs of Deceased Rider and Injured Pillion Riders Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

11 Sep 2019

The case involves three appeals filed by The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against judgments and awards of the Claims Tribunal, Raigad, in three motor ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Discharge of Accused in School Van Accident Case — No Prima Facie Case of Rash or Negligent Driving. Court holds that mere involvement in an accident does not establish rash or negligent driving under Sections 279, 304-A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act.

6 Sep 2018

The present criminal revision was filed by the complainant, Ashok Tarachand Ramteke, challenging the order of the Sessions Judge, Wardha, who discharg...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Fatal Bus Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash and Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304(A) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

10 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Medappa, was the driver of a bus that met with an accident on 28 July 2000 at about 9:30 a.m., resulting in the death of eight passeng...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — No Liability for Own Accident Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Driving Without Licence Constitutes Breach of Policy Condition, Absolving Insurer of Liability for Death of Owner-Driver.

22 Jun 2017

The case involves an appeal by The New India Assurance Co. Limited against the judgment and order dated 15/01/2008 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribun...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Minor Pillion Rider. Negligence of Qualis Driver Established as Sole Cause of Accident, Insurance Company Liable to Pay Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

15 Jun 2015

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 27.3.2009 at about 11:40 am at the junction of Hebbal ring road near Bharath Cancer Hospital, M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 2,00,000 to Rs. 3,50,000 for Death of 24-Year-Old Bachelor. Multiplier of 18 applied and 50% deduction for personal expenses upheld as per legal principles.

19 Nov 2010

The appeal challenges the judgment and award dated 10.5.2004 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Mapusa in Claim Petition No. 40/2002. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Appreciation of Evidence. Negligence of Driver Established Through Oral Testimony and Site Inspection Report, Entitling Claimant to Compensation Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

11 Oct 2010

The appellant, Laximan Vithoba Gaunkar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation of Rs. 2,00,000...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)