Search Results for "radiological age"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent — Conviction Under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Absence of Consent Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The appellant, Munja s/o Jijabhau Bhange, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in POCSO Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Acquittal of Accused for Offences Under Sections 363, 376, 506 IPC and Sections 4, 12 of POCSO Act Upheld Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration.

The State of Karnataka, through Bharamasagara Police Station, filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) Cr.P.C. against the judgment of acquittal d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Penetration.

The appellant, Momin Mazhar alias Babbu, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Consensual Relationship and Lack of Evidence of Promise to Marry. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC and POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix was a consenting minor and no false promise of marriage established.

The appellant, Prashant Ramchandra Kasarkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Yavatmal in Special (POCSO) Case 63/2017 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Juvenile Plea in Rape Case — Ossification Test Indicates Age Above 18 Years. Margin of Error Not Applied as Test Conducted Near Incident Date and School Records Not Produced.

The petitioner, Shaikh Azhar @ Shahrukh s/o Shaikh Shikur, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection of hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Appeal for Non-Prosecution Due to Repeated Absence of Counsel. Court Relies on Bani Singh Precedent to Dismiss Appeal on Merits After Counsel Fails to Appear Despite Multiple Opportunities.

The appellant, Ramkrishna Ganesh Wagh, was convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the Sessions Court, Akola, in Sessions Trial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Conviction under Sections 3(a), 5(j)(ii), 5(l) of POCSO Act and Sections 376, 417 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's age not proven beyond reasonable doubt and relationship was consensual.

The appellant, Kundan Pendor, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 3(a), 5(j)(ii), and 5(l) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape and Criminal Intimidation in Repeated Sexual Assault Case. Victim's Testimony Found Credible Despite Delay in FIR, Medical Evidence of Pregnancy Corroborates Prosecution Case Under Sections 376 and 506(i) IPC.

The appellant, Mahadev Kondiba Jagtap, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No.306 of 2009 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376, 363, 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(xii) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Contradicts Rape Allegation.

The appellant, Ravindra Yogiraj Paul, was convicted by the Special Judge (Atrocity Case) for offences under Sections 376, 363, and 506 of the Indian P...