Search Results for "purification"

47 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 47 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows BSNL's Appeal Against Section 9 Order for Handover of Equipment in Arbitration Dispute Between Lessor and Lessee. Third Party Not Bound by Arbitration Agreement Cannot Be Directed to Handover Possession Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves an appeal filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Favour of Decree-Holder Against Judgment-Debtors. Court Rejects Objections Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Including Public Policy, Non-Arbitrability, Fraud, Limitation, and Res Judicata.

The applicant, Integrated Sales Services Limited, a Hong Kong-based company, obtained a foreign arbitral award dated 28 March 2010 from an Internation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in FPSO Charter Hire Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contract clauses and rejection of counterclaims, finding no patent illegality or perversity in the award.

The judgment concerns four arbitration petitions filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concilia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Section 9 Arbitration Application Due to Lack of Party Identity with Arbitration Agreement. Joint Venture Agreement's Arbitration Clause Does Not Bind Non-Signatory Respondents as They Are Not Parties to the Agreement.

The appeal was filed against the judgment and order dated 2 July 2014 of the learned Single Judge in Arbitration Petition No.66 of 2014, which dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Intermediate Product Marketability. Court holds that CESTAT failed to consider relevant evidence regarding marketability of loosely assembled fibre web used captively for manufacture of exempted jute carpets.

The appellant, M/s Hitkari Hitech Fibres Pvt. Ltd., is a manufacturer of products under Chapters 56 and 57 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Tax Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case — Rear Courtyard Not Part of Built-Up Area for Section 80-IB(10) Computation. The court held that the Tribunal cannot inquire into matters beyond the lis between the parties.

The appellant, M/s. Commonwealth Developers, a partnership firm, filed its return of income for the assessment year 2006-07 declaring a total income o...