Search Results for "principal offender"

413 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 413 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Arrest Warrant in Maintenance Case — Failure to Consider Objections and Lack of Proper Service Render Order Unsustainable. Family Court directed to reconsider husband's objections in proceedings under Section 125 CrPC after ensuring proper service of notice.

The petitioner, Sri Sailesh Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengalur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution of Directors for Delayed TDS Deposit Under Section 276B Income Tax Act — Delay Not Equivalent to Failure to Pay. Vicarious Liability Requires Specific Averments of Being In-Charge and Responsible; No Notice Under Section 2(35) or Order Under Section 201(1) Passed.

The petitioners, directors of M/s. Hubtown Ltd., challenged the issuance of process against them under Section 276B r/w 278B of the Income Tax Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application Challenging Amendment in Cheque Dishonour Case. Amendment to Add Vicarious Liability Pleadings Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Held Permissible as It Does Not Change Nature of Complaint or Cause Prejudice.

The case arises from a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by the original complainant Syed Mazaruddin (since de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Order Allowing Amendment of Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case — Amendment After Cognizance and Process Held Not Permissible Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by the applicants (accused) challenging an o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.

On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010422252008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Death Sentence Confirmation and Appeals against Conviction in 2000 Church Bomb Blast. Accused were convicted under Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A IPC by Trial Court for conspiracy and bomb blast at St. Peter and Paul Church, Bangalore.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard together a criminal reference for confirmation of death sentence and two criminal appeals arising from ...