Search Results for "prejudicial activity"

197 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 197 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in Unlawful Assembly Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations and Communal Harmony. Sections 143, 147, 148, 153A, 504, 506, 149 IPC Not Attracted as Incident Was a Spontaneous Altercation Without Common Object or Communal Motive.

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of FIR ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Unexplained Delay. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to establish live-link between alleged activities and public order disturbance.

The petitioner challenged a detention order passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 (MPDA Act) and its subsequent ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Retraction of Statement and Bail Conditions Ignored, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, son of the detenu Bittu Choith Harchandani, challenged a detention order dated 16.4.2015 passed by the second respondent under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Lack of Proximity and Non-Application of Mind. Detention orders set aside as the detenus were not directly involved in smuggling and the detaining authority failed to consider less drastic alternatives.

The Bombay High Court, by a judgment dated 24 January 2014, allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order in Bombay Police Act Case — Excessive Area and Lack of Nexus. Externment Order Covering Four Districts Set Aside as Prejudicial Activities Confined to Two Police Stations, Violating Section 56(1)(a)(b) of Bombay Police Act, 1951.

The petitioner, Ayub Abdul Sattar Shaikh, challenged an externment order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-VI, Mumbai, under Section 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay Snapping Live-Link. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Delay of 25 Days in Passing Order Not Satisfactorily Explained by Detaining Authority.

The petitioner, Mandar Ajit Borkar, challenged his preventive detention order dated 14th October 2011 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider that detenu was on bail and conditions ensured no prejudicial activity.

The petitioner, Intezar Umar Daraj Khan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 31st October 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mum...