Search Results for "phenolphthalein test"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "phenolphthalein test"

55 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Complainant's Failure to Support Prosecution Case and Lack of Independent Witnesses Lead to Confirmation of Acquittal Under Sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

20 Mar 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Corruption Case, Restores FIR Against Police Officer for Demand of Bribe. High Court Erred in Quashing FIR at Pre-Evidence Stage by Holding No Demand or Acceptance Without Trial.

1 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Karnataka through the Lokayukta Police against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court at ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

31 Aug 2024

The appellant, B.M. Venkatappa, a Second Division Assistant in the Office of the Director, Employees State Insurance, Bengaluru, was convicted by the ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(ii) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

5 Nov 2020

The appellant, Pradeep H. Harwalkar, a Junior Passenger Assistant with Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., was convicted by the Special Court for CBI in ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Public Servant in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Despite Minor Contradictions in Witness Testimony. The court held that minor discrepancies in the testimonies of complainant and panch witness regarding the place of payment and hand-wash do not vitiate the conviction when the core evidence of demand, acceptance, and recovery is consistent.

27 Nov 2019

The appellant, Vinod Kumar Garg, a public servant working with the Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking (DESU), was convicted under Sections 7 and 13 of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act cannot be sustained when primary evidence of demand is absent due to complainant's death and no other reliable evidence establishes demand.

28 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Mrs. Neeraj Dutta, an LDC in Delhi Vidyut Board, who was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Sec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

14 Aug 2018

The appellant, Deorao Marotrao Bhagatkar, was the Principal of Kendriya Vidyalaya, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, in S...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

14 Aug 2012

The appellant, Ashwin Chintaman Shambharkar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 18 of 1997 for offences under Section 7 an...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

6 Aug 2012

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Baliram Ghodke (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe — Conviction under Sections 161, 165 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Set Aside. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt, and the recovery of tainted money from a third party was insufficient to sustain conviction.

16 Jan 2006

The appellant, Ananda Sukhdeo Gangane, a Talathi (revenue officer), was convicted by the Special Judge, Khamgaon for offences under Sections 161 and 1...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)