Search Results for "personal vendetta"

165 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 498-A IPC Against Husband and In-Laws in Matrimonial Discord Case. Allegations of Cruelty Fail Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Abuse of Process of Law

The Applicants, including the husband and his family members, filed a criminal application seeking quashing of an FIR registered under Section 498-A r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR in Criminal Petitions Under BNSS, 2023 Due to False Allegations of Physical Relationship on Pretext of Marriage. Petitioners Acquitted as Proceedings Deemed Abuse of Process

The High Court of Karnataka heard two criminal petitions filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking to quash a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes POCSO Proceedings Against Stepfather, Citing Matrimonial Dispute Between Parents. Allegations of Sexual Offences Deemed Maliciously Filed Amidst Custody Battle, Court Holds No Prima Facie Case Under Sections 11, 12 of POCSO Act and Section 509 IPC.

The dispute involved a child born in 2008 to the second respondent and his former wife. Following the parents' divorce, a settlement agreement granted...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Gulshan Kumar Murder Case — Life Imprisonment for Murder and Attempt to Murder Confirmed. Evidence of Identification by Injured Witness and Recovery of Weapon Held Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The judgment pertains to the murder of Gulshan Kumar Dua, the founder of T-Series, who was shot dead on 12 August 1997. The appellant, Abdul Rauf Dawo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Debarment of Retired CCI Officials from Legal Practice. Petition lacks bonafide public interest and is motivated by personal vendetta.

The petitioner, Dr. Savio Pereira, filed a writ petition purportedly as a public interest litigation before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Filed as Public Interest Litigation for Abuse of Process. Exemplary Costs of Rs.1,40,000/- Imposed on Petitioners for Suppressing Material Facts and Pursuing Private Vengeance under Guise of PIL.

The petitioners, fourteen residents of P.Dasapura village, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Cons...