Search Results for "penetration"

153 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 153 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes POCSO Proceedings Against Accused Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Sexual Assault. Allegation of Penetration Not Supported by Medical Evidence or Victim's Statement Under Section 164 CrPC.

The petitioner, Krishnappa, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of Special Case No.28/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Accused in POCSO Case — Upholds Conviction for Rape of Five-Year-Old Based on DNA Evidence. Semen on Victim's Clothes Matched Accused's DNA, Corroborating Victim's Account Despite Absence of Physical Injuries.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of the accused for the rape of a five-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(i)(j) IPC and Section 5(m)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Girl in POCSO Case. Conviction under Sections 302, 376(2)(f), 377, 363, 364, 367, 201 IPC and POCSO Act affirmed based on DNA evidence and circumstantial evidence.

The case pertains to the kidnapping, rape, unnatural sex, and murder of a 5-year-old girl by her neighbor, the appellant Dattatraya @ Datta Ambo Rokad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction Under Section 376 Read with 511 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Contradicts Prosecution Story of Attempted Rape.

The appellant, Shankar Thakre, was convicted by the Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Sessions Trial 33/2002 for offences under Section 363 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mangesh Chandankhede, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-1, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i) of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unreliable Child Witnesses and Lack of Evidence of Sexual Assault. Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Penetration Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bandu s/o Natthuji Raut, was convicted by the Special Judge, Yavatmal, for offences under Sections 451, 376(2)(i)(j)(1) of the Indian P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Unnatural Sex with Infant Under Section 377 IPC — Acquittal for Kidnapping and Rape Sustained. The court found the mother's testimony credible and corroborated by medical evidence of anal injuries, confirming forcible unnatural sex.

The appellant, Ramkisan Surajmal Harijan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, in Sessions Case No. 330 of 2006 for the off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Maroti s/o Domaji Sadmake, was convicted by the trial court under Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for allegedly raping a ...